Egypt vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Egypt
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 164,615 t against 157,609 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 7,006 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Egypt ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 24th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60,660 t | 102,348 t | 41,688 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 81,681 t | 92,454 t | 10,774 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 108,461 t | 125,112 t | 16,650 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 146,162 t | 138,877 t | 7,286 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Egypt or Uzbekistan?
- Egypt, at 164,615 t against 157,609 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Egypt and Uzbekistan?
- 7,006 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Egypt ranks 23rd and Uzbekistan ranks 24th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).