Eritrea vs Polynesia: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Eritrea
1,112 t
in 2023
Polynesia
925.94 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
161st
Polynesia rank
164th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Eritrea
  • Polynesia
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 1,112 t against 925.94 t in Polynesia, a difference of 186.06 t.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Polynesia ahead.

Eritrea ranks 161st and Polynesia ranks 164th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Polynesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Polynesia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,250 t 1,303 t 53.45 t Polynesia
2000s 1,481 t 1,266 t 215.18 t Eritrea
2010s 1,139 t 1,181 t 42.01 t Polynesia
2020s 1,111 t 978.67 t 132.1 t Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or Polynesia?
Eritrea, at 1,112 t against 925.94 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and Polynesia?
186.06 t, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Polynesia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Polynesia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Eritrea ranks 161st and Polynesia ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).