Eritrea vs Qatar: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eritrea
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 1,154 t against 1,112 t in Eritrea, a difference of 42 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 161st and Qatar ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,250 t | 121.56 t | 1,128 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,481 t | 131.4 t | 1,350 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 1,139 t | 519.8 t | 619.21 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 1,111 t | 1,155 t | 43.99 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 1,154 t against 1,112 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and Qatar?
- 42 t, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Qatar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Qatar rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Eritrea ranks 161st and Qatar ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).