Estonia vs Haiti: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Estonia
7,082 t
in 2023
Haiti
6,668 t
in 2023
Estonia rank
127th
Haiti rank
129th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Estonia
  • Haiti
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 7,082 t against 6,668 t in Haiti, a difference of 414 t.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 127th and Haiti ranks 129th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Haiti in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Haiti Difference Ahead
1990s 9,403 t 4,074 t 5,328 t Estonia
2000s 6,454 t 6,650 t 195.82 t Haiti
2010s 7,920 t 12,294 t 4,374 t Haiti
2020s 8,613 t 7,182 t 1,431 t Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Haiti?
Estonia, at 7,082 t against 6,668 t in Haiti as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Haiti?
414 t, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Haiti?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Haiti rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Estonia ranks 127th and Haiti ranks 129th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).