Estonia vs New Zealand: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Estonia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 7,082 t against 5,928 t in New Zealand, a difference of 1,154 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 127th and New Zealand ranks 130th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,403 t | 9,209 t | 193.73 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 6,454 t | 9,854 t | 3,400 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 7,920 t | 8,032 t | 111.66 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 8,613 t | 7,372 t | 1,241 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or New Zealand?
- Estonia, at 7,082 t against 5,928 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and New Zealand?
- 1,154 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and New Zealand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and New Zealand rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Estonia ranks 127th and New Zealand ranks 130th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).