Eswatini vs Iceland: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eswatini
- Iceland
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2,187 t against 2,015 t in Iceland, a difference of 172 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Eswatini ranks 149th and Iceland ranks 150th of 201 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 750.54 t | 3,193 t | 2,442 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 1,521 t | 4,257 t | 2,735 t | Iceland |
| 1980s | 1,991 t | 4,119 t | 2,128 t | Iceland |
| 1990s | 1,329 t | 3,147 t | 1,818 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 1,369 t | 2,844 t | 1,475 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1,770 t | 3,308 t | 1,538 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 2,188 t | 2,566 t | 378.36 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Eswatini or Iceland?
- Eswatini, at 2,187 t against 2,015 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Eswatini and Iceland?
- 172 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Iceland rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Eswatini ranks 149th and Iceland ranks 150th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).