Ethiopia PDR vs Kenya: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Kenya
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 70,312 t against 63,608 t in Kenya, a difference of 6,704 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th and Kenya ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,962 t | 9,092 t | 2,870 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 23,689 t | 14,428 t | 9,262 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 41,052 t | 24,014 t | 17,038 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 56,379 t | 29,258 t | 27,121 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Kenya?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 70,312 t against 63,608 t in Kenya as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Kenya?
- 6,704 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Kenya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Kenya rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th and Kenya ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).