Ethiopia PDR vs Morocco: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Morocco
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 70,312 t against 61,829 t in Morocco, a difference of 8,483 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th and Morocco ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,962 t | 14,184 t | 2,222 t | Morocco |
| 1970s | 23,689 t | 26,550 t | 2,861 t | Morocco |
| 1980s | 41,052 t | 45,280 t | 4,228 t | Morocco |
| 1990s | 56,379 t | 48,772 t | 7,607 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Morocco?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 70,312 t against 61,829 t in Morocco as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Morocco?
- 8,483 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Morocco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Morocco rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th and Morocco ranks 47th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).