Ethiopia PDR vs Republic of Korea: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 70,868 t against 70,312 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 556 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 42nd and Republic of Korea ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,962 t | 58,085 t | 46,123 t | Republic of Korea |
| 1970s | 23,689 t | 94,627 t | 70,938 t | Republic of Korea |
| 1980s | 41,052 t | 99,167 t | 58,115 t | Republic of Korea |
| 1990s | 56,379 t | 118,112 t | 61,733 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 70,868 t against 70,312 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Republic of Korea?
- 556 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Republic of Korea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Republic of Korea rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 42nd and Republic of Korea ranks 40th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).