Ethiopia vs Italy: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Italy
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 147,597 t against 134,861 t in Italy, a difference of 12,736 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Italy ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 27th and Italy ranks 30th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,940 t | 313,385 t | 267,444 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 52,283 t | 227,362 t | 175,079 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 99,240 t | 156,324 t | 57,084 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 142,408 t | 138,984 t | 3,424 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Italy?
- Ethiopia, at 147,597 t against 134,861 t in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Italy?
- 12,736 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Italy?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Italy rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 27th and Italy ranks 30th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).