Ethiopia vs Japan: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Japan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 147,597 t against 146,879 t in Japan, a difference of 718 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Japan ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 27th and Japan ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,940 t | 324,318 t | 278,378 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 52,283 t | 247,933 t | 195,650 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 99,240 t | 199,192 t | 99,952 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 142,408 t | 168,061 t | 25,653 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Japan?
- Ethiopia, at 147,597 t against 146,879 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Japan?
- 718 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Japan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Japan rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 27th and Japan ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).