Ethiopia vs Ukraine: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 156,625 t against 147,597 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 9,028 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,940 t | 259,953 t | 214,013 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 52,283 t | 158,052 t | 105,769 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 99,240 t | 218,487 t | 119,247 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 142,408 t | 213,744 t | 71,337 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 156,625 t against 147,597 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Ukraine?
- 9,028 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Ukraine?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Ukraine rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 24th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).