Finland vs Latvia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Finland
- Latvia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 21,385 t against 17,541 t in Latvia, a difference of 3,844 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 91st and Latvia ranks 94th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44,795 t | 14,308 t | 30,487 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 32,755 t | 11,266 t | 21,489 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 23,822 t | 16,420 t | 7,402 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 22,235 t | 18,660 t | 3,575 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Finland or Latvia?
- Finland, at 21,385 t against 17,541 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Finland and Latvia?
- 3,844 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Latvia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Finland ranks 91st and Latvia ranks 94th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).