Finland vs Mali: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Finland
- Mali
How they compare
Finland currently reports 21,385 t against 19,853 t in Mali, a difference of 1,532 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 91st and Mali ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 81,552 t | 2,325 t | 79,228 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 95,752 t | 3,712 t | 92,040 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 85,685 t | 5,013 t | 80,672 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 47,992 t | 7,717 t | 40,275 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 32,755 t | 11,752 t | 21,003 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 23,822 t | 22,430 t | 1,393 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 22,235 t | 23,697 t | 1,461 t | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Finland or Mali?
- Finland, at 21,385 t against 19,853 t in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Finland and Mali?
- 1,532 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Mali rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Finland ranks 91st and Mali ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).