French Polynesia vs Guadeloupe: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- French Polynesia
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 166.11 t against 163.93 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 2.18 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 182nd and Guadeloupe ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Guadeloupe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 68.41 t | 1,038 t | 969.82 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 114.18 t | 1,363 t | 1,249 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 238.46 t | 1,364 t | 1,125 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 296.16 t | 1,162 t | 865.58 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 239.6 t | 707.42 t | 467.82 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 206.26 t | 134.93 t | 71.32 t | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 196.54 t | 158.81 t | 37.73 t | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, French Polynesia or Guadeloupe?
- French Polynesia, at 166.11 t against 163.93 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between French Polynesia and Guadeloupe?
- 2.18 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Guadeloupe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Guadeloupe rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- French Polynesia ranks 182nd and Guadeloupe ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).