Georgia vs Israel: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Georgia
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 4,622 t against 3,986 t in Georgia, a difference of 636 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 134th and Israel ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,037 t | 11,202 t | 6,165 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 3,050 t | 8,606 t | 5,555 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 3,222 t | 5,950 t | 2,728 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 3,933 t | 4,983 t | 1,050 t | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Georgia or Israel?
- Israel, at 4,622 t against 3,986 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Georgia and Israel?
- 636 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Israel?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Israel rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Georgia ranks 134th and Israel ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).