Ghana vs Latvia: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Ghana
17,249 t
in 2023
Latvia
17,541 t
in 2023
Ghana rank
95th
Latvia rank
94th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Ghana
  • Latvia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 17,541 t against 17,249 t in Ghana, a difference of 292 t.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Ghana ranks 95th and Latvia ranks 94th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,884 t 14,308 t 10,424 t Latvia
2000s 7,287 t 11,266 t 3,979 t Latvia
2010s 21,053 t 16,420 t 4,633 t Ghana
2020s 28,840 t 18,660 t 10,179 t Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Ghana or Latvia?
Latvia, at 17,541 t against 17,249 t in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Ghana and Latvia?
292 t, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Ghana ranks 95th and Latvia ranks 94th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).