Guadeloupe vs Kiribati: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guadeloupe
- Kiribati
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 163.93 t against 99.89 t in Kiribati, a difference of 64.04 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 1.6 times Kiribati's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guadeloupe has been ahead every year.
Guadeloupe ranks 169th and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
Guadeloupe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,038 t | 38.65 t | 999.58 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 1,363 t | 41.81 t | 1,321 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 1,364 t | 46.11 t | 1,317 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 1,162 t | 51.33 t | 1,110 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 707.42 t | 76.75 t | 630.67 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 134.93 t | 95.34 t | 39.59 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2020s | 158.81 t | 99.38 t | 59.43 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Guadeloupe or Kiribati?
- Guadeloupe, at 163.93 t against 99.89 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Guadeloupe and Kiribati?
- 64.04 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guadeloupe and Kiribati rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Guadeloupe ranks 169th and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).