Honduras vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Honduras
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 26,058 t against 23,618 t in Honduras, a difference of 2,440 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Honduras ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,366 t | 10,456 t | 5,090 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 6,537 t | 19,809 t | 13,271 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 6,871 t | 21,346 t | 14,475 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 11,579 t | 21,249 t | 9,670 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 12,893 t | 15,328 t | 2,435 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 20,641 t | 20,201 t | 440.7 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 22,816 t | 27,731 t | 4,915 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Honduras or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 26,058 t against 23,618 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Honduras and Zimbabwe?
- 2,440 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Honduras ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).