Iceland vs Namibia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Iceland
- Namibia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2,015 t against 1,647 t in Namibia, a difference of 368 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,193 t | 868.88 t | 2,324 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 4,257 t | 891.41 t | 3,365 t | Iceland |
| 1980s | 4,119 t | 813.63 t | 3,305 t | Iceland |
| 1990s | 3,147 t | 869.39 t | 2,278 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 2,844 t | 1,071 t | 1,773 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 3,308 t | 1,510 t | 1,798 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 2,566 t | 1,378 t | 1,189 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Iceland or Namibia?
- Iceland, at 2,015 t against 1,647 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Iceland and Namibia?
- 368 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Iceland ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).