Indonesia vs Russian Federation: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Indonesia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 730,795 t against 561,533 t in Indonesia, a difference of 169,262 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.3 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Indonesia ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 264,198 t | 761,400 t | 497,202 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 260,097 t | 500,712 t | 240,615 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 620,923 t | 586,435 t | 34,488 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 602,756 t | 729,896 t | 127,140 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Indonesia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 730,795 t against 561,533 t in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Indonesia and Russian Federation?
- 169,262 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Russian Federation rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Indonesia ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).