Italy vs Myanmar: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Italy
- Myanmar
How they compare
Italy currently reports 134,861 t against 120,995 t in Myanmar, a difference of 13,866 t.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 30th and Myanmar ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 272,794 t | 34,631 t | 238,164 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 340,843 t | 46,205 t | 294,639 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 397,127 t | 67,563 t | 329,564 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 328,363 t | 68,144 t | 260,219 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 227,362 t | 81,386 t | 145,976 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 156,324 t | 130,576 t | 25,748 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 138,984 t | 120,132 t | 18,851 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Italy or Myanmar?
- Italy, at 134,861 t against 120,995 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Italy and Myanmar?
- 13,866 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Myanmar rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Italy ranks 30th and Myanmar ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).