Japan vs Romania: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Japan
- Romania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 146,879 t against 130,483 t in Romania, a difference of 16,396 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 28th and Romania ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 280,801 t | 120,017 t | 160,784 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 356,462 t | 251,940 t | 104,522 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 370,905 t | 328,604 t | 42,301 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 333,786 t | 142,421 t | 191,365 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 247,933 t | 94,152 t | 153,781 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 199,192 t | 126,282 t | 72,910 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 168,061 t | 144,085 t | 23,976 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Japan or Romania?
- Japan, at 146,879 t against 130,483 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Japan and Romania?
- 16,396 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Romania rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Japan ranks 28th and Romania ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).