Japan vs Southern Africa: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Japan
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Japan currently reports 146,879 t against 123,037 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 23,842 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 28th and Southern Africa ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 280,801 t | 92,498 t | 188,303 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 356,462 t | 153,678 t | 202,784 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 370,905 t | 167,703 t | 203,202 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 333,786 t | 113,471 t | 220,315 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 247,933 t | 94,408 t | 153,525 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 199,192 t | 115,585 t | 83,607 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 168,061 t | 136,245 t | 31,816 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Japan or Southern Africa?
- Japan, at 146,879 t against 123,037 t in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Japan and Southern Africa?
- 23,842 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Southern Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Southern Africa rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Japan ranks 28th and Southern Africa ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).