Japan vs Ukraine: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Japan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 156,625 t against 146,879 t in Japan, a difference of 9,746 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Japan ranks 28th and Ukraine ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 328,498 t | 291,579 t | 36,919 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 247,933 t | 158,052 t | 89,881 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 199,192 t | 218,487 t | 19,296 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 168,061 t | 213,744 t | 45,684 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Japan or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 156,625 t against 146,879 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Japan and Ukraine?
- 9,746 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Ukraine rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Japan ranks 28th and Ukraine ranks 26th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).