Kazakhstan vs Peru: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kazakhstan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 61,611 t against 61,165 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 446 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 49th and Peru ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92,322 t | 31,546 t | 60,776 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 44,131 t | 49,830 t | 5,699 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 58,358 t | 69,269 t | 10,912 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 63,399 t | 69,069 t | 5,670 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Kazakhstan or Peru?
- Peru, at 61,611 t against 61,165 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Kazakhstan and Peru?
- 446 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Peru rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Kazakhstan ranks 49th and Peru ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).