Kenya vs Serbia: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Kenya
63,608 t
in 2023
Serbia
63,180 t
in 2023
Kenya rank
45th
Serbia rank
46th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Kenya
  • Serbia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 63,608 t against 63,180 t in Serbia, a difference of 428 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Kenya ranks 45th and Serbia ranks 46th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 46,701 t 47,396 t 695.1 t Serbia
2010s 64,138 t 50,635 t 13,503 t Kenya
2020s 71,820 t 57,606 t 14,214 t Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Kenya or Serbia?
Kenya, at 63,608 t against 63,180 t in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Kenya and Serbia?
428 t, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Kenya ranks 45th and Serbia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).