Latvia vs Mali: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Latvia
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 19,853 t against 17,541 t in Latvia, a difference of 2,312 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 94th and Mali ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,308 t | 8,262 t | 6,046 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 11,266 t | 11,752 t | 486.02 t | Mali |
| 2010s | 16,420 t | 22,430 t | 6,009 t | Mali |
| 2020s | 18,660 t | 23,697 t | 5,036 t | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Latvia or Mali?
- Mali, at 19,853 t against 17,541 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Latvia and Mali?
- 2,312 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mali rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Latvia ranks 94th and Mali ranks 92nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).