Lesotho vs Mauritius: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lesotho
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 800.72 t against 654.08 t in Lesotho, a difference of 146.64 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Lesotho ranks 167th and Mauritius ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 671.72 t | 2,116 t | 1,445 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1,233 t | 1,365 t | 131.95 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 2,210 t | 1,702 t | 508.01 t | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 1,765 t | 2,360 t | 595.19 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,268 t | 2,246 t | 978.03 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 742.23 t | 1,900 t | 1,158 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 592.57 t | 1,121 t | 528.82 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Lesotho or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 800.72 t against 654.08 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Lesotho and Mauritius?
- 146.64 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Mauritius rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Lesotho ranks 167th and Mauritius ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).