Madagascar vs Republic of Moldova: Input β Cropland phosphorus
Input β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Madagascar
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 14,508 t against 14,383 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 125 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Madagascar ranks 105th and Republic of Moldova ranks 107th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,768 t | 22,345 t | 11,576 t | Republic of Moldova |
| 2000s | 8,652 t | 7,021 t | 1,632 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 11,910 t | 13,108 t | 1,198 t | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 14,098 t | 14,538 t | 440.3 t | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland phosphorus, Madagascar or Republic of Moldova?
- Madagascar, at 14,508 t against 14,383 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland phosphorus between Madagascar and Republic of Moldova?
- 125 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Republic of Moldova rank globally for input β cropland phosphorus?
- Madagascar ranks 105th and Republic of Moldova ranks 107th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).