Malaysia vs Middle Africa: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malaysia
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 118,401 t against 70,711 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 47,690 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.7 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 33rd and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,208 t | 10,966 t | 12,242 t | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 36,423 t | 18,918 t | 17,505 t | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 66,766 t | 25,769 t | 40,997 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 97,246 t | 28,834 t | 68,412 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 103,842 t | 36,378 t | 67,464 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 135,159 t | 56,650 t | 78,509 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 122,136 t | 68,146 t | 53,989 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Malaysia or Middle Africa?
- Malaysia, at 118,401 t against 70,711 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Malaysia and Middle Africa?
- 47,690 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Middle Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Middle Africa rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Malaysia ranks 33rd and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).