Malta vs Solomon Islands: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malta
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Malta currently reports 265.71 t against 207.03 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 58.68 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 177th and Solomon Islands ranks 180th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 238.86 t | 88.88 t | 149.98 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 335.65 t | 149.53 t | 186.12 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 530.94 t | 180.15 t | 350.79 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 603.79 t | 188.72 t | 415.06 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 587.09 t | 200.02 t | 387.08 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 390.77 t | 280.72 t | 110.05 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 365.16 t | 211.97 t | 153.19 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Malta or Solomon Islands?
- Malta, at 265.71 t against 207.03 t in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Malta and Solomon Islands?
- 58.68 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Solomon Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Solomon Islands rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Malta ranks 177th and Solomon Islands ranks 180th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).