Malta vs Tonga: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malta
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 283.57 t against 265.71 t in Malta, a difference of 17.86 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 177th and Tonga ranks 176th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 238.86 t | 94.95 t | 143.92 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 335.65 t | 181.84 t | 153.81 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 530.94 t | 304.61 t | 226.33 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 603.79 t | 278.27 t | 325.52 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 587.09 t | 269.54 t | 317.56 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 390.77 t | 298.07 t | 92.7 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 365.16 t | 296.9 t | 68.25 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Malta or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 283.57 t against 265.71 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Malta and Tonga?
- 17.86 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Tonga rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Malta ranks 177th and Tonga ranks 176th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).