Mauritania vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mauritania
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 2,458 t against 2,196 t in Mauritania, a difference of 262 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 148th and Sierra Leone ranks 145th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,019 t | 677.06 t | 341.78 t | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 902.61 t | 877.76 t | 24.85 t | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 1,018 t | 936.17 t | 81.42 t | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 1,306 t | 1,005 t | 300.97 t | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 1,617 t | 774.8 t | 842.29 t | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 2,049 t | 1,702 t | 347.44 t | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 2,261 t | 2,490 t | 228.99 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Mauritania or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 2,458 t against 2,196 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
- 262 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Mauritania ranks 148th and Sierra Leone ranks 145th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).