Mauritius vs Suriname: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mauritius
- Suriname
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 800.72 t against 689.46 t in Suriname, a difference of 111.26 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 165th and Suriname ranks 166th of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,116 t | 305.81 t | 1,811 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1,365 t | 496.17 t | 868.92 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1,702 t | 808.56 t | 893.4 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 2,360 t | 561.92 t | 1,798 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 2,246 t | 838.54 t | 1,407 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1,900 t | 962.7 t | 937.03 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1,121 t | 787.06 t | 334.33 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Mauritius or Suriname?
- Mauritius, at 800.72 t against 689.46 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Mauritius and Suriname?
- 111.26 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Suriname rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Mauritius ranks 165th and Suriname ranks 166th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).