Mexico vs Syrian Arab Republic: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mexico
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 299,914 t against 12,981 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 286,933 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 23.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 14th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 77,266 t | 5,203 t | 72,063 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 147,102 t | 12,647 t | 134,455 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 236,220 t | 37,367 t | 198,853 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 207,350 t | 55,996 t | 151,354 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 217,973 t | 50,091 t | 167,882 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 256,202 t | 15,450 t | 240,753 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 292,919 t | 10,713 t | 282,206 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Mexico or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Mexico, at 299,914 t against 12,981 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Mexico and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 286,933 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Mexico ranks 14th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).