Montenegro vs Puerto Rico: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Montenegro
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 1,208 t against 1,176 t in Montenegro, a difference of 32 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 159th and Puerto Rico ranks 158th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,566 t | 1,472 t | 94.96 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 1,353 t | 1,848 t | 494.58 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 1,213 t | 1,299 t | 85.68 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Montenegro or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 1,208 t against 1,176 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
- 32 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Puerto Rico?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Puerto Rico rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Montenegro ranks 159th and Puerto Rico ranks 158th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).