Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Serbia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Serbia
How they compare
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 70,759 t against 63,180 t in Serbia, a difference of 7,579 t.
That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84,111 t | 47,396 t | 36,715 t | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
| 2010s | 80,977 t | 50,635 t | 30,342 t | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
| 2020s | 73,008 t | 57,606 t | 15,402 t | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Serbia?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 70,759 t against 63,180 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Serbia?
- 7,579 t, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Serbia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 41st and Serbia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).