New Caledonia vs Samoa: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- New Caledonia
- Samoa
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 412.11 t against 346.02 t in Samoa, a difference of 66.09 t.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 172nd and Samoa ranks 174th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 281.21 t | 168.46 t | 112.75 t | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 271.47 t | 208.28 t | 63.19 t | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 338.03 t | 500.59 t | 162.56 t | Samoa |
| 1990s | 539.33 t | 571.6 t | 32.28 t | Samoa |
| 2000s | 461.41 t | 605.1 t | 143.69 t | Samoa |
| 2010s | 400.07 t | 525.47 t | 125.4 t | Samoa |
| 2020s | 414.73 t | 349.33 t | 65.4 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, New Caledonia or Samoa?
- New Caledonia, at 412.11 t against 346.02 t in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between New Caledonia and Samoa?
- 66.09 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Caledonia and Samoa rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- New Caledonia ranks 172nd and Samoa ranks 174th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).