New Zealand vs Slovenia: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- New Zealand
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 6,751 t against 5,928 t in New Zealand, a difference of 823 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 130th and Slovenia ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,209 t | 10,049 t | 839.76 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 9,854 t | 8,417 t | 1,437 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 8,032 t | 6,264 t | 1,768 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 7,372 t | 6,212 t | 1,160 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, New Zealand or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 6,751 t against 5,928 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 823 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- New Zealand ranks 130th and Slovenia ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).