Nigeria vs Philippines: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Nigeria
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 117,971 t against 100,768 t in Nigeria, a difference of 17,203 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.
Nigeria ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 34th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,109 t | 42,426 t | 15,317 t | Philippines |
| 1970s | 34,954 t | 52,250 t | 17,296 t | Philippines |
| 1980s | 68,589 t | 55,529 t | 13,060 t | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 75,088 t | 84,605 t | 9,517 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 73,805 t | 98,570 t | 24,765 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 96,728 t | 106,623 t | 9,895 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 112,001 t | 150,930 t | 38,929 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Nigeria or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 117,971 t against 100,768 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Nigeria and Philippines?
- 17,203 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Philippines rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Nigeria ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 34th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).