Northern Africa vs Poland: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Northern Africa
- Poland
How they compare
Northern Africa currently reports 320,263 t against 195,576 t in Poland, a difference of 124,687 t.
That makes Northern Africa's figure about 1.6 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Northern Africa ranks 24th and Poland ranks 22nd of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Northern Africa averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 59,532 t | 281,761 t | 222,229 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 115,633 t | 500,362 t | 384,729 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 207,033 t | 499,678 t | 292,645 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 181,336 t | 233,989 t | 52,653 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 206,025 t | 251,884 t | 45,860 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 285,162 t | 237,397 t | 47,764 t | Northern Africa |
| 2020s | 296,417 t | 216,389 t | 80,028 t | Northern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Northern Africa or Poland?
- Northern Africa, at 320,263 t against 195,576 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Northern Africa and Poland?
- 124,687 t, with Northern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Northern Africa and Poland rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Northern Africa ranks 24th and Poland ranks 22nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).