Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Panama
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Panama currently reports 8,737 t against 7,583 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1,154 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 126th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,325 t | 1,988 t | 337.15 t | Panama |
| 1970s | 3,856 t | 2,833 t | 1,023 t | Panama |
| 1980s | 4,344 t | 3,813 t | 530.84 t | Panama |
| 1990s | 5,662 t | 5,323 t | 339.13 t | Panama |
| 2000s | 4,555 t | 6,435 t | 1,880 t | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 8,079 t | 6,947 t | 1,132 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 8,565 t | 7,679 t | 885.74 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Panama or Papua New Guinea?
- Panama, at 8,737 t against 7,583 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Panama and Papua New Guinea?
- 1,154 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Papua New Guinea rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Panama ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).