Paraguay vs Sudan (former): Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Paraguay
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 90,766 t against 76,436 t in Paraguay, a difference of 14,330 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.2 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 41st and Sudan (former) ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 3 and Sudan (former) in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,170 t | 4,261 t | 91.22 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 5,524 t | 5,348 t | 175.34 t | Paraguay |
| 1980s | 10,348 t | 8,928 t | 1,419 t | Paraguay |
| 1990s | 17,747 t | 26,953 t | 9,206 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 49,434 t | 33,732 t | 15,702 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 83,125 t | 91,067 t | 7,942 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Paraguay or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 90,766 t against 76,436 t in Paraguay as of 2011.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Paraguay and Sudan (former)?
- 14,330 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Paraguay and Sudan (former) rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Paraguay ranks 41st and Sudan (former) ranks 40th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).