Philippines vs Romania: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Philippines
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 130,483 t against 117,971 t in Philippines, a difference of 12,512 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Philippines ranks 34th and Romania ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42,426 t | 120,017 t | 77,591 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 52,250 t | 251,940 t | 199,690 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 55,529 t | 328,604 t | 273,076 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 84,605 t | 142,421 t | 57,816 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 98,570 t | 94,152 t | 4,418 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 106,623 t | 126,282 t | 19,658 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 150,930 t | 144,085 t | 6,845 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Philippines or Romania?
- Romania, at 130,483 t against 117,971 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Philippines and Romania?
- 12,512 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Philippines and Romania rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Philippines ranks 34th and Romania ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).