Russian Federation vs Viet Nam: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Russian Federation
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 730,795 t against 445,421 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 285,374 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.6 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 186 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 761,400 t | 192,534 t | 568,866 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 500,712 t | 349,565 t | 151,147 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 586,435 t | 443,106 t | 143,329 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 729,896 t | 442,862 t | 287,035 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Russian Federation or Viet Nam?
- Russian Federation, at 730,795 t against 445,421 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Russian Federation and Viet Nam?
- 285,374 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Viet Nam?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Russian Federation and Viet Nam rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Russian Federation ranks 6th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).