Seychelles vs Tuvalu: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Seychelles
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 46.81 t against 46.61 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.2 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Seychelles ahead.
Seychelles ranks 181st and Tuvalu ranks 183rd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Seychelles averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21.61 t | 18.48 t | 3.13 t | Seychelles |
| 1970s | 45.17 t | 18.73 t | 26.44 t | Seychelles |
| 1980s | 67.5 t | 26.17 t | 41.34 t | Seychelles |
| 1990s | 82.06 t | 40.64 t | 41.42 t | Seychelles |
| 2000s | 39.92 t | 44.06 t | 4.14 t | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 31.84 t | 45.96 t | 14.12 t | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 42.36 t | 46.66 t | 4.3 t | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Seychelles or Tuvalu?
- Seychelles, at 46.81 t against 46.61 t in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Seychelles and Tuvalu?
- 0.2 t, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Seychelles and Tuvalu rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Seychelles ranks 181st and Tuvalu ranks 183rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).