Southern Europe vs Yugoslav SFR: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Southern Europe
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Southern Europe currently reports 582,769 t against 216,348 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 366,421 t.
That makes Southern Europe's figure about 2.7 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Southern Europe has been ahead every year.
Southern Europe ranks 19th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Southern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Europe | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 720,633 t | 216,368 t | 504,265 t | Southern Europe |
| 1970s | 929,026 t | 277,390 t | 651,636 t | Southern Europe |
| 1980s | 1.05 million t | 341,352 t | 706,770 t | Southern Europe |
| 1990s | 1.02 million t | 245,738 t | 773,297 t | Southern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Southern Europe or Yugoslav SFR?
- Southern Europe, at 582,769 t against 216,348 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Southern Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 366,421 t, with Southern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Europe and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Southern Europe and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Southern Europe ranks 19th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).