Sri Lanka vs Togo: Input — Cropland phosphorus
Input — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sri Lanka
- Togo
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 9,994 t against 9,927 t in Togo, a difference of 67 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 118th and Togo ranks 120th of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,205 t | 1,048 t | 11,156 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 12,244 t | 1,405 t | 10,839 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 19,475 t | 2,473 t | 17,002 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 17,745 t | 3,874 t | 13,872 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 20,421 t | 3,481 t | 16,940 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 24,612 t | 6,308 t | 18,304 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 14,742 t | 7,472 t | 7,271 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Sri Lanka or Togo?
- Sri Lanka, at 9,994 t against 9,927 t in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 67 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Togo rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
- Sri Lanka ranks 118th and Togo ranks 120th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).