Sweden vs Uganda: Input — Cropland phosphorus

Sweden
28,419 t
in 2023
Uganda
27,674 t
in 2023
Sweden rank
77th
Uganda rank
80th

Input — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Sweden
  • Uganda
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 28,419 t against 27,674 t in Uganda, a difference of 745 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Sweden ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 80th of 201 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 80,920 t 2,460 t 78,460 t Sweden
1970s 88,454 t 3,158 t 85,296 t Sweden
1980s 66,640 t 3,573 t 63,067 t Sweden
1990s 44,641 t 8,160 t 36,482 t Sweden
2000s 34,907 t 12,973 t 21,934 t Sweden
2010s 31,879 t 20,804 t 11,075 t Sweden
2020s 31,436 t 27,108 t 4,328 t Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland phosphorus, Sweden or Uganda?
Sweden, at 28,419 t against 27,674 t in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland phosphorus between Sweden and Uganda?
745 t, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Uganda rank globally for input — cropland phosphorus?
Sweden ranks 77th and Uganda ranks 80th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).